77 307
Assignments Done
Successfully Done
In July 2019

Answer to Question #19104 in Abstract Algebra for edward

Question #19104
This is not a math problem. Because there is no philosophy to choose in the subject.

premises:∀x [(Cube(x) ∧ Large(x)) ∨ (Tet(x) ∧ Small(x))]
∀x [Tet(x) → BackOf(x, c)]
conclusion:∀x [Small(x) → BackOf(x, c)]

give an informal proof. If it is not valid, use Tarski's World to construct a counter example.
Expert's answer
Unfortunately, your question requires a lot of work and cannot be done for free.
Submit it with all requirements as an assignment to our control panel and we'll assist you.

Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!


No comments. Be first!

Leave a comment

Ask Your question

Privacy policy Terms and Conditions