Answer to Question #221261 in British Law for Musenga sichona

Question #221261

Singo Manda bought 4 bottles of Mazoe juice from Pick n Pay, this drink was manufactured and packaged by Caissons bottlers of Lusaka. Singo Manda and his children had opened and drunk from one of the juice bottles. However, they noticed that one of the juice bottles that was not yet opened thereby not yet consumed contained a dead snail in it.

Knowing that you are a business law student, Mr Singo Manda comes to you for advice on whether he has a claim for damages for personal injury as a result of the dead snail in the bottle.



1
Expert's answer
2021-08-24T04:45:02-0400

The tort of negligence refers to a breach of a legal duty of care which results in damage to the plaintiff. The elements of liability in tort of negligence are;

  • The defendant must owe the claimant a duty of care
  • There must be a breach of that duty
  • The breach must cause loss to the claimant

The loss must not be too remote and must be able to raise a defense to the claimant's actions.

In Caparo Industries v Dickman (1990) case a duty of care owed to a person can be by a 3 stage test. These are;

  • It was reasonably foreseeable that a person in the claimant's position would be injured
  • There was sufficient proximity between claimant and defendant
  • It is fair and just to impose a duty of care under the circumstance

In Bourhill v Young (1943) a cliamant's claim of duty of care was denied due to no-proximity between the claimant and defendant. In Macfarlane v Tayside Health Board was denied a duty of care.

In this case Mr Musonda Chimba can prove that the manufacturer owes him and his children a duty of care. That duty was breached when a drink with a dead snail was sold to him. However it does not cause any loss to Mr Musonda Chimba and the loss caused is too remote to prove any actual loss. Since Mr Musonda Chimba  and his family had neither opened the bottle nor consumed of its contents their claim for loss or injury may be too remote and thus unfair and unjustifiable to impose liability on the manufacturer.


Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!

Leave a comment

LATEST TUTORIALS
APPROVED BY CLIENTS