Answer to Question #136357 in Political Science for Oumou Diallo

Question #136357
According to Clinton v. Jones, is the president immune from civil lawsuits?
1
Expert's answer
2020-10-08T08:46:28-0400


 According to Clinton v. Jones, the incumbent president has no executive immunity to the lawsuit litigated in the constitution. Therefore, just like any other law-abiding citizen, a president should be held responsible for any misconduct in and out of the office. Succinctly, delaying the federal cases until the president exits the office is unnecessary as he or she is not exceptional to the states’ federal laws (Justia US Supreme Court). In 1994, when Jones filed the case in Arkansas accusing the president, the lawyers postpone the judges that the sitting president was immune to laws as approved on 21st 1994. The ruling judge claims that no one would sue the sitting president, hence deferring the case until the president concluded his terms in the office. In such a case, the president had a temporary immunity, of which it came long overdue after some years.



References

Justia US Supreme Court. Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681 (1997)

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/520/681/


Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Comments

No comments. Be the first!

Leave a comment

Ask Your question

LATEST TUTORIALS
New on Blog
APPROVED BY CLIENTS