Given the main elements of judicial restraint and also given the idea of judicial interpretation, do you think courts are generally able to balance the two rules for the appropriate role of the judiciary noted above? Are there times when courts should defer to more democratic institutions? Are there times when courts should play a role in defining the law? Defend your answer by articulating what you think to be the case and whether democracy ought to be able to live with judicial review.
Dear Francisco, your question requires a lot of work, which neither of our experts is ready to perform for free. We advise you to convert it to a fully qualified order and we will try to help you. Please click the link below to proceed: Submit order