# Answer to Question #3459 in Linear Algebra for Mike

Question #3459
Let β={u1, u2, ... , un} be a subset of Fn containing n distinct vectors and let B be an nxn matrix in F having uj as column j. Prove that β is a basis for Fn if and only if det(B)≠0. For one direction of the proof this is something that I found : Since β consists of n vectors, β is a basis if and only if these vectors are linearly independent, which is equivalent to the map LB being one-to-one. Since the matrix B is square, this is in turn equivalent to B being invertible, hence having a nonzero determinant. However I do not understand the transition from the vectors being linearly independent to being one to one. Why is this true? Is there a better way to prove this? Also, how do I prove the reverse direction?
Necessity:
We have that &beta;=(u1,u2,&hellip;,un) is a basis for Fn. Let&rsquo;s prove that det(B) &ne; 0.
Suppose we have an equation:
c1 u1+c2 u2+...+cn un=0 where c1,c2,...,cn - unknown variables.
It represents a system of n equations for each component. The matrix of this system is matrix B. We know that ci=0 i = (1,n) is a solution of the system. But as &beta; must be a basis than the system must have no other solutions except c_i=0 i=(1,n).
So det(B) &ne; 0 (as a result of Cramer&rsquo;s rule).

Sufficiency:

We have that det(B)&ne;0. Let&rsquo;s prove that &beta;=(u1,u2,&hellip;,un) is a basis for Fn.
Suppose that u1,u2,&hellip;,un are linearly dependent. Than the equation c1 u1+c2 u2+...+cn un = 0 has non-zero solution.
Let c1 &ne; 0. So
u1= - c2/c1 u2 -&hellip;- cn/c1 un. When we calculate det(B), we calculate it as a sum of determinants: because each of the determinants = 0 (each has 2 equal columns).
But det(B) must be non-zero. So our assumption was wrong and u1,u2,&hellip;,un are linearly independent.
As we have n linearly independent vectors in Fn, &beta; is a basis of Fn.

Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!