60 740
Assignments Done
97,9%
Successfully Done
In April 2018

Philosophy Answers

Questions: 120

Free Answers by our Experts: 46

Ask Your question

Need a fast expert's response?

Submit order

and get a quick answer at the best price

for any assignment or question with DETAILED EXPLANATIONS!

Search & Filtering

The philosophy the teacher employs to facilitate learning better and also accommodate all learners in the classroom
Let’s say Tom told you he thinks the beard is part
of his personal religion that he is forming. Do
you think that announcement would change how
you talk to Tom about the issue?
What was your group’s consensus decision regarding
the issue with Tom’s facial hair?
diagramming the argument
I shouldn't take physics this semester. My course load is already too heavy. Theres no room for the course in my schedule. And i don't like physics.
Analogical argument
Your older brother was an athlete, a bright student, a nonconformist, and he was very self-disciplined. You have developed these same traits. Since he chose not to smoke cigarettes,
cigars, or a pipe; use snuff; or chew tobacco, you should choose the same course of action.

Premise 1 is:
You and your brother are alike in the following respects: athletes, bright students,
nonconformists, and very selfdisciplined.
Premise 2 is:
Your brother chose not to smoke cigarettes, cigars, or a pipe; use snuff; or chew tobacco.
The conclusion is:
You should choose the same course of action.

Suppose the younger brother said the following: "My older brother did not play an instrument,
but I do. He was not good at art, but I am. He did not eat meat, but I do." Which strategy of
evaluation does this represent?

Possible answers:

A. Pointing out disanalogies between the things being compared.

B.Constructing a counteranalogy.

C. Determining an unintended consequence of the analogy.
Analogical argument
Your older brother was an athlete, a bright student, a nonconformist, and he was very selfdisciplined.
You have developed these same traits. Since he chose not to smoke cigarettes,
cigars, or a pipe; use snuff; or chew tobacco, you should choose the same course of action.
Premise 1 is:
You and your brother are alike in the following respects: athletes, bright students,
nonconformists, and very selfdisciplined.
Premise 2 is:
Your brother chose not to smoke cigarettes, cigars, or a pipe; use snuff; or chew tobacco.
The conclusion is:
You should choose the same course of action.

Suppose the younger brother said the following: "My older brother drinks beer even though you are against it. So, I should be able to drink, too." Which strategy of evaluation does this
represent?

Possible answers:
A. Pointing out disanalogies between the things being compared.

B. Constructing a counteranalogy.

C. Determining an unintended consequence of the analogy.
Analogical argument

Your older brother was an athlete, a bright student, a nonconformist, and he was very self-disciplined.You have developed these same traits. Since he chose not to smoke cigarettes,
cigars, or a pipe; use snuff; or chew tobacco, you should choose the same course of action.

Premise 1 is:
You and your brother are alike in the following respects: athletes, bright students,
nonconformists, and very selfdisciplined.

Premise 2 is:
Your brother chose not to smoke cigarettes, cigars, or a pipe; use snuff; or chew tobacco.
The conclusion is:
You should choose the same course of action.

If the characteristics that are claimed to be similar between the things being compared are
relevant, does that make the argument stronger?
Possible Answers:
A. yes
B. no
Analogical argument
Your older brother was an athlete, a bright student, a nonconformist, and he was very self-disciplined. You have developed these same traits. Since he chose not to smoke cigarettes,
cigars, or a pipe; use snuff; or chew tobacco, you should choose the same course of action.

Premise 1 is:
You and your brother are alike in the following respects: athletes, bright students,
nonconformists, and very self-disciplined.
Premise 2 is:
Your brother chose not to smoke cigarettes, cigars, or a pipe; use snuff; or chew tobacco.
The conclusion is:
You should choose the same course of action.


What characteristics are claimed to be similar between the things being compared?
Possible answers:

A. Athletes, bright students, nonconformists, and very selfdisciplined.

B. You and your brother.

C. Your brother chose not to smoke cigarettes, cigars, or a pipe; use snuff; or chew
tobacco.
How did Hume`s empiricism lead him to inductive skepticism?
How did logical positivists use Hume`s for to try to show us the statements made by Hegel were "meaningless"?
Submit
Privacy policy Terms and Conditions