What did Eysenck find in his study of therapy effectiveness?
Scientific proof illustrates that psychotherapy is more effective than the medication used in curing depression, particularly when the consumer’s contentment and their future follow-up are put into consideration.
Landis illustrated that before measurement is made, establishing the base line together with a common unit of measure is appropriate. The only kind of unit of measure that is offered is the report that is made, often by the physician affirming recovery of the patient. This type of unit might probably be as suitable as any type of human idiosyncratic judgment, involving of both the bad and good points of such judgments (Slight, 1938). Landis suggests that a unit, is that which represents the therapeutic results as in terms of all the patients that have recovered or developed according to a certain number of cases that are admitted to hospital. Landis also realized undoubtedly that to evaluate the success of any method of therapy, accurate data from a certain recorded control group of patients who aren’t treated would be necessary in order to equate the resulting effects of therapy with the impulsive remission rate.
A survey made of reports on the development of certain neurotic patients who underwent psychotherapy and their results were likened with the best and available approximations of recovery and without the benefit of such kind of therapy. However, the numbers fail to back the theory that psychotherapy expedites the regaining from neurotic disorder. Additionally, in the opinion of the numerous hitches relating to such actuarial assessments, there are no additional assumptions that could be derived from the statistics whose limitations highlight the need of properly deliberated and executed experimental trainings into this important field.
Slight, D. (1938). Concepts and Problems of Psychotherapy. Leland E. Hinsie. Social Service Review, 12(2), 156.